Say no to KMT, brainwashing, and double standards

1. I have written frequently to ask Taiwanese not to say unification (統一), but to say what it really is intended : cession (併吞). For example, Taiwanese should never say 統一 and 說併吞,不說統一. The latter is short so I reproduce it here:

   Taiwanese should stop using the term 統一; we should call it what it is intended to be: 併吞. When we start 說併吞,不說統一, we tell the world that there has never been any equitable, amiable talk of union with China. Instead we are fighting for our lives not to be conquered and destroyed like Tibet. Domestically, the term 統一 helps to brainwash our people, as if it were something to look forward to.

2. Taiwanese must use the same standards to judge KMT and DPP
   
   • If you say you could not vote for DPP because DPP is corrupt, then how could you vote for KMT which is one of the worst in humanity when it comes to corruption? If you could not vote for a thief, how can you vote for Hitler?
   • If Chen Shui-Bian broke your heart and makes you unable to vote for DDP, then how come 馬英九, 郝龍斌, 李慶安, 邱毅, 王清峰, 宋楚瑜, 王建煊, and all other KMT people did not break your heart and make you unable to vote for KMT? [Incidentally, I raised this questions many times: Can anyone give me a list of just three KMT people who are ethical? I have yet to get a response.]
   • You have heard tons about the need for people to 切割 Chen Shui-Bian. Have you heard about people doing any 切割 with Ma Yean-Jeou? Chen Shui-Bian may be a thief, but he has never killed anyone and he had never tried to turn Taiwan into Tibet like Ma. Ask yourselves why Taiwanese have only applied 切割 to DPP and not KMT.
     
3. Get rid of KMT unless you want Taiwan to turn into Tibet
   • Recall any and all KMT legislators
   • Recall Ma Yean-Jeou
   • Never vote KMT and actively urge your friends and family to never vote for KMT in any election.
     
     
4. Stop lamenting. Start working on saving Taiwan! As an example, an article such as the following is not useful or even harmful, unless it makes you stronger.
   

   【觀察筆記】思 痛
   自由時報╱自由時報 2009-01-23 06:00
   
   是重擊？是推離？對民進黨。
   
   扁家洗錢案在陳致中夫婦認罪下，事實輪廓浮現。
   
   一如陳水扁的出書、女兒陳幸妤投書掀起政治恩怨的回顧一樣，陳水扁與民進黨的瓜蔓糾葛該有了斷了。
   
   了斷，是一種壯烈，也是悲恨情懷。
   
   他對兩次總統大選支持者傷害之深，遠遠大於給民進黨的重擊。因為投票給他的選民多的非民進黨員，他們激動著一份本土感情，炙熱的火在心頭烙印著台灣之名。
   
   如今，激動已黯然，炙熱已冷漠！
   
   陳水扁掀開政權輪替第一頁，站在台灣人總統的第一高峰，掌聲、榮耀的加冕之時，以為是給他的，沖昏頭中，不覺該還諸於台灣，功勞歸於所有人民。
   
   民主不是阿扁創造，也非阿扁克竟全功；在民主化浪潮大洶湧奔向台灣那一刻，他有幸站在浪頭上。回顧曾經付出身家性命或終身默默的無名，他們有誰居功而耀武揚威過？
   
   二千年，他的何其有幸，竟是日後台灣民主與民進黨的不幸。民主大業成就了嗎？司法改革，人權維護在他的案子中竟成主訴求，諷刺中細思過往他的應為未為，只有悲乎兩字做註解。
   
   可割捨了，但是仍陷入派系爭位泥沼中的民進黨脫得了困否？
   
   （記者黃明裕）